• All my encounter is with IMR 4198 and Ramshot TAC. TAC flowed and metered slightly superior, but 4198 grouped a lot better, shot softer and remaining the gun cleaner. And
All those are certainly not definitely Severe temperatures; I'd use H335 devoid of hesitation less than Individuals problems. In actual fact, I do use a fair level of H335 in my 356.
In my intellect there is absolutely no cause to exceed the outlined data. They pressure test the loads and all are Safe and sound if made use of as published. Looking at primers together with other procedures that aren't true instruments for force testing just isn't an exact evaluate of stress.
Posted: 5/3/2016 7:forty seven:forty eight AM EDT [#9] I've been attempting CFE223 with some fifty five grain bullets. Continue to dealing with it. I'm able to mention that It appears to "feed" pretty much. I have been applying my Hornady electronic powder measure/scale although Doing work up my loads. The CFE223 feeds so fast the powder measure won't be able to correctly meter it (the Digital just one). It offers me frequent above alarms. Even using the mode button to decelerate the metering in excess of placing it in "gradual" doesn't perform. I have not tried it from the normal powder evaluate yet but anticipate it would be extremely steady. I did, kind of Fortunate genuinely, operate throughout an extremely accurate BLC2 load a few variety visits back again.
I've employed BLC 2 For a long time. Just You should not leave your ammo out inside the Sunshine for hrs if It is scorching outside the house.
P.S. Gonehuntingagain and Dave in idaho should really adhere to your illustration on providing well mannered and beneficial information on this great Discussion board.
Quoted: Alright glad I requested. The CFE posts great teams And that i have already got it determined so I'll roll with it.
.223 has these types of a mix of headstamp origins that some commercial has fewer capability than some NATO and vice versa. Even if some instances are around the minimal facet of case volumes, the demand is likewise about the lower aspect for H335.
Based mostly upon my data with my CZ 527 .223 Varmint CFE223 retains it individual towards H335 Using the bullets the CZ shoots best. CFE223 burns cleaner but necessitates far more powder to obtain the same velocity.
I only desire i could sell several of my oops'es in powder I've piled up. Was nearsighted first spherical and have a LB of 332 at your house,Undecided what thats good for.Loaded about 20 rounds with that and resolved which was out.
questioning if any one has thoughts on which powder might be much better to employ and why. I take advantage of cfe223 in various loads and also have loads of it. I have two pounds of H335 and don’t utilize it in anything else nevertheless.
I weigh more info Check out on the size, 1 out of every ten I demand with powder by dumping the charge out within the pan, confirming the charge bodyweight and afterwards putting the powder back again in the situation.
During the post the writer did terribly destruction his gun (occurred above 20 years ago) whilst reaching for just a bit far more velocity applying data over the outlined data. He stretched the load simply because he was not obtaining the velocity he felt the cartridge was effective at. In stepping up the demand in 1/2 grain increments, the load amount prior to the damaging one, knocked the the journal go over open up and he disregarded that only to Visit the upcoming move and established again the lugs around the rifle.
The above mentioned remarks also apply to cup-and-Main bullet types, as their construction, bearing area and seating depth varies enough to vary pressures of a offered powder demand. Anytime a bullet is substituted, start with get started loads and operate up cautiously.